Joe Biden Is Going To Destroy As Much As Possible On His Way Out The Door, You Won’t Beleive Why
Have you ever seen a drunk person being asked to leave a fancy restaurant? Maybe you haven’t in real life, but you’ve probably seen it in a movie or TV show. The person is told politely but firmly to leave, and instead of just walking out quietly, they cause a big scene—knocking over glasses, bumping into people, and making lots of noise as they leave.
That’s kind of what President Joe Biden and his administration seem to be doing as they near the end of their time in office. Their actions could not only harm Biden’s legacy but also lead to big changes in how future transitions of power are handled.
Think back to when President Obama’s time in office was ending. Some people in political positions—jobs that are supposed to end when a president leaves—moved into other government roles so they could stay and make things harder for the new Trump administration. It looks like Biden’s team is doing something similar, but instead of people, they’re doing it with ideas and projects, even ones that Congress decided to shut down.
One example is the Global Engagement Center (GEC). This was a State Department office that was accused of working with groups to censor conservative media. In late 2024, Congress agreed to stop funding it, effectively shutting it down. But instead of fully closing the office, the Biden administration quietly reassigned its employees and funding to a new group with a different name but a similar purpose. This move goes against the agreement to close the GEC. Biden might not be fully aware of what’s happening, but since he’s the president, he’s still responsible for it.
Other decisions from Biden’s administration also raise questions. For instance, they sold off materials meant for building the border wall, seemingly just to get rid of them out of spite. There’s also been massive spending on Ukraine, with no clear explanation of where all the money is going or what the long-term plan is.
Another major controversy is Biden’s decision to block the sale of US Steel to Nippon, a Japanese company. Nippon is not an enemy—it’s from Japan, a close ally of the U.S. Nippon offered to invest heavily in US Steel to turn it around and secure jobs for its workers. However, Biden claimed the deal was a “national security” risk without giving a clear reason. US Steel’s CEO called the decision “shameful and corrupt,” accusing Biden of prioritizing political favors over what’s best for the company and its employees. Instead, a lower offer from Cleveland-Cliffs, a company cozy with unions, seems to have been favored.
These actions make Biden’s administration look like it’s creating unnecessary problems as they leave office. Some of the damage they’ve done can’t be undone. For example, money already sent to Ukraine is gone, and any pardons or commutations Biden gives before leaving office are permanent. However, some issues, like the block on US Steel, could be reversed by the next president.
This behavior shows why it might be time to rethink what presidents can do in the final months after an election. Right now, presidents have three months of full power after losing an election or deciding not to run again. If they choose to act irresponsibly, they can cause a lot of harm during that time. Changing the rules could stop future presidents from creating unnecessary chaos, allowing them to leave office with dignity instead of acting like the disruptive drunk at a restaurant.
