Kamala Says Strange Things in Australia Interview And Proves Once Again Why Voters Rejected Her

Kamala Harris hasn’t made many public appearances since she lost in the November election, but she recently showed up in an unexpected place—a real estate conference in Australia. It’s a bit confusing why someone in her position would speak at an event like that, which is mostly about property and business, not politics. Still, she sat down for an interview with a well-known figure in the real estate industry, John McGrath, for nearly an hour.

During the interview, McGrath praised Harris, calling her one of the most successful women in history and saying her best work was still ahead of her. That statement was met with heavy sarcasm by the writer, who clearly disagrees and believes Harris’s political career has been a failure. The writer pointed out how she spent over a billion dollars and still lost the election badly, and suggested her chances of ever becoming president are almost zero.

Harris tried to be inspirational in the interview, saying things like she doesn’t take no for an answer, and that she’s used to being told she’s not ready or that it’s not her time. But the writer took this as tone-deaf, reminding readers that voters already told her “no” in both 2020 and 2024.

Instead of reflecting on her loss or mentioning Donald Trump, Harris spoke vaguely about global issues and the importance of learning from history. She warned about the dangers of ignoring the past and spoke about how countries are connected and need each other. However, her speech was mocked as confusing and repetitive, especially for how often she used the word “important.”

She also joked during the event about being unemployed, laughing on stage. Despite that, she received applause and a standing ovation, even walking on and off to Beyoncé’s song *Halo*. The writer found that moment ridiculous and suggested she should have spent more time on real plans instead of trying to create dramatic moments.

The article ends by doubling down on criticism, saying Americans are fortunate that Harris didn’t win and hoping she stays out of elected office. It even warns that she might still try to run for governor of California, though she could face criticism there too—especially over claims that she stayed silent while President Biden’s condition worsened during his time in office. Some California political figures have already spoken out, questioning why she didn’t act.

Overall, the article paints Kamala Harris as someone who has failed politically, doesn’t take responsibility, and speaks in empty phrases. The writer clearly supports Donald Trump and believes his return to the presidency is a good thing, contrasting it sharply with Harris’s performance.