Politics

Very stupid’: Trump chided for suggesting Beyonce, Oprah, and Kamala should be prosecuted

Please Share

Donald Trump, who is running for president again and previously served as the U.S. President, made a statement online that sparked a lot of backlash. In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, he claimed that several well-known public figures—Vice President Kamala Harris, talk show host Oprah Winfrey, civil rights activist Al Sharpton, and pop superstar Beyoncé—should be prosecuted. Trump accused them of breaking campaign finance laws, saying they were involved in illegal political endorsements and possibly received or gave money in exchange for support. He insisted that this kind of behavior is against the law and called for them to be criminally charged.

Trump questioned what would happen if politicians openly paid people to endorse them, saying it would create chaos and that laws would be clearly broken. According to him, Kamala Harris and others had done exactly that and should face the consequences. However, he didn’t provide any real evidence to back up these claims. The names he mentioned—especially celebrities like Oprah and Beyoncé—seem to have been included without any documented reason or proof of wrongdoing.

His statement quickly drew strong reactions from political commentators, journalists, and former government officials. Many people criticized the remarks as being not only unfounded but also hypocritical. Phillip Bump, a former columnist for the Washington Post, responded by saying the comment was “very stupid” and reminded the public that Trump himself was recently convicted of felony crimes. Those convictions were related to him attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election by secretly paying to suppress a story about his alleged affair with a porn star. So while Trump is accusing others of breaking campaign finance laws, he has actually been found guilty of similar or worse conduct.

Another journalist, Yashar Ali, clarified that there is no evidence that Beyoncé or Oprah were ever paid to endorse Kamala Harris or any political candidate. He emphasized that Trump’s claims don’t match reality and seem designed more to stir controversy than to raise a legitimate legal issue.

Political strategist Elizabeth Cronise McLaughlin mocked Trump’s comments and suggested he was lashing out because of his own fear and desperation. She brought up Trump’s well-known connections to Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender who died in jail under suspicious circumstances. She implied that if Trump really wanted transparency and justice, he should support releasing all files related to Epstein instead of going after celebrities who simply supported a political candidate.

A group called “Republicans Against Trump” also responded, accusing Trump of using this new controversy to distract from his own past. They suggested that Trump’s accusations were part of a pattern—whenever he feels pressure from legal trouble or bad headlines, he lashes out and tries to shift the public’s attention elsewhere by saying outrageous things.

Overall, Trump’s post was widely seen as an attempt to stir outrage and distract from his own legal and political issues. Many viewed it as dishonest and dangerous, especially since it involved baseless accusations against public figures with no history of legal wrongdoing. His critics believe this is part of a broader pattern of behavior, where he attacks others to divert attention away from himself and to energize his most loyal supporters by making dramatic claims with no real foundation.

Please Share

Leave a Response