People disgusted after seeing how Trump is spending his day following worst stock market crash since 2020
Public outrage has erupted over President Trump’s actions in the wake of last week’s devastating stock market crash, which saw $2 trillion in value evaporate following his sweeping tariff announcement. While global markets reeled from the economic shockwaves of his “Liberation Day” speech, Trump retreated to his Florida golf resort rather than addressing the crisis, creating a stark contrast between presidential responsibility and personal indulgence.
The timing could not have been worse—his golf outing coincided with the solemn return of four fallen U.S. soldiers, amplifying criticism that he prioritized leisure over leadership during a moment of national significance. Instead of reassuring markets, coordinating with economic advisors, or acknowledging the financial panic his policies triggered, Trump hosted LIV Golf executives at his property, ensuring that taxpayer-funded security and travel expenses would once again flow into his private business.
The incident underscores long-standing concerns about Trump’s governance—or lack thereof—during critical moments. His decision to golf rather than respond to the market crash reinforces accusations that he governs impulsively, without regard for consequences or contingency planning. Financial experts warn that the tariffs could push the economy toward recession, yet the president’s actions suggest disengagement at best, indifference at worst.
This is not the first time Trump has faced backlash for mixing personal interests with presidential duties, but the scale of this economic fallout makes his choice to retreat to the golf course particularly jarring. For critics, it epitomizes a presidency that blurs the line between public service and private gain, with little accountability for how time, taxpayer money, or crises are managed.
As the market continues to wobble under the weight of his trade policies, this moment may well be remembered not just for its economic impact, but for the president’s tone-deaf response—one that prioritized his own pastimes over stabilizing the economy or honoring national sacrifice.
